Trans woman sues OB-GYN for refusing treatment of male genitalia

Jessica Yaniv, now known as Jessica Simpson, is a Canadian transgender activist who rose to national attention in 2018 after filing a series of human rights complaints against several beauticians. The complaints stemmed from their refusal to perform a Brazilian wax on her male genitalia. Simpson sought thousands of dollars in damages, but the British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal ultimately dismissed the cases. The tribunal found that the estheticians were not trained to handle male anatomy and concluded that Simpson had engaged in improper conduct by targeting immigrant and minority women, raising broader concerns about her intentions and behavior throughout the proceedings.

Since the initial controversy, Simpson has continued to attract public attention by filing multiple human rights complaints. Among them was a case against a local fire department, which she accused of discrimination after it declined to help her out of a bathtub—following a series of non-emergency calls. More recently, she filed a complaint against a gynecologist, alleging she was denied care due to her transgender status. However, critics noted that at the time, Simpson still had male genitalia and did not require gynecological treatment, raising questions about the legitimacy of the claim.

Critics argue that gynecologists are trained specifically in female reproductive health and should not be expected to treat patients with male anatomy. They contend that transgender individuals deserve respectful, competent care—but from medical professionals qualified to provide it. While Simpson expressed emotional distress over the refusal, many experts emphasize that the issue centers on medical qualifications, not discrimination.

The case has ignited intense public debate. Supporters view it as a fight for equal rights in healthcare, while others see it as a troubling example of the system being misused. At the heart of the controversy lies a provocative question: Should medical treatment prioritize a patient’s gender identity—or their biological anatomy?

What do you think? Join the conversation and share this story to keep the dialogue alive.